Damaged PM Docs
PM Color Mgmt
Viruses & PM
Tips & Tricks
Type & Typography
Utilities & Plug-Ins
PageMaker at Adobe
Before & After
Listserv et al
Search for a List
How you can help!
You can donate money to offset the cost of hosting the site with Paypal by clicking the "donate" button above.
About This Site
Design philosophy: all information in this web site should be accessible to the intended audience regardless of platform, browser, or size of screen. Graphics are kept to a minimum to reduce download times. If you see a frame or an animated GIF, feel free to flame me mercilessly.
This site uses fully compliant cascading style sheets (CSS). Older browsers should display text in their default fonts, while more recent browsers will all display fully formatted text. (However, the styles sheets will look best viewed in Internet Explorer 4.0 or above.) The site also complies with major accessibility standards.
The base font for this page is Trebuchet MS, a free font from Microsoft designed for on-screen readability at small point sizes. The headlines are 32 pt Times bold italic, combining elegance, classical proportions, and compactness.
The logo is variation on the original logo from Aldus PageMaker and depicts Aldus Manutius, a student of Johannes Gutenberg and inventor of italics. This is to echo the roots of desktop publishing, both in the 1450s and the 1980s. The logo uses Courier from ITC to evoke the feel of metal type and Poetica from Adobe Systems to evoke the era of hand lettering.
An Introduction to Scanning for the Beginning Desktop Publisher
Now that scanners can be bought for less that US $100 and good quality laser printers for less than US $500, more and more people are becoming their own publishers. Often, these people are disappointed with the results.
Recommended File Formats
> I have been told that you should only place pictures in PM as .tif. Is
TIFF is the best format for photos. JPEG is "lossy," meaning part of its compression involves deleting information. But the algorithm is extremely clever and most people will never notice the missing data. So the answer to your questions (most of them, anyway) is NO. TIFF is best, but not the ONLY format you can use. JPEG is perfectly fine in many instances -- it was invented by the Joint Photographic Expert Group for the purpose of saving photographs, after all. Just make sure you have not over-compressed it or repeatedly compressed it -- open a JPEG, alter it, and save it in JPEG format, and you lose MORE data. If you will be touching up the photo (in Photoshop, e.g.), work in TIFF, then (optionally) save the final result in JPEG and you should be OK. Converting a JPEG to TIFF will not lose any data, but converting a TIFF to JPEG will.
What Resolution to Choose
If you were SCANNING a photo, you would want to calculate the size and resolution, using the rule of thumb "Scan DPI should be 1.5-2x the output LPI." But you may not have a choice if you are using a digital camera. Many cameras save photos in JPEG format by default, to save memory in the camera, and very few give you any control over resolution. One thing you may have to do is reduce the size of your photo in order to gain resolution (resolution is dots per inch, so reducing the size in inches increases the DPI). Note: I'm using some of these terms a little loosely, which might get me flamed on the Photoshop list! If you're unfamiliar with any of these terms, you can ask here or look them up in the DTP Glossary.
> I have a customer who gave me digital pictures for their newsletter in
72 dpi isn't much -- only enough for about a 50 line halftone screen, about what you'd get from an old 300 dpi laser printer. Happily, this doesn't mean much. Remember, your digital image's size is measures in pixels, and your resolution is measures in pixels per inch.
It's like saying "It's 100 miles to the nearest gas station and my car gets 30 miles per gallon. Can I make it?" There isn't enough information. You need to know how many gallons of gas you have left.
That picture could be 15" wide at 72 dpi or 1" wide at 72 dpi. Just make sure that when placed at the correct size the picture's resolution is greater than 72. You may want to open the pictures in Photoshop, tweak them if needed, set the resolution you want, and save them as TIFFs.
Anyway, the ratio between pixels per inch to lines per inch is mildly controversial. Some say 1.5 to 1, someone posted recently about a book (?) that advocated 1.4 to 1 (square root of 2 is 1.414...), and some say 2 to 1.
By the way, if you started out in photography, you may still think in terms of colour photos and B & W photos, especially when someone refers to "pictures." Greyscale is a recent invention of the computer age, while "a Greyscale" has been part of the Graphic arts industry for some time. Continuous tone (contone) may be a more accurate term for colour or B & W images (photos and art) which require screening. Line drawings and other types of artwork are another matter. Sure, use 600, 800 or 1200 optical dpi whenever you can. Optical dpi is the raw dpi produced by the mechanism and optical elements of the machine, not generated by mathematical magic.
Black and White or Color?
When most people say black and white, they really mean greyscale. This means capturing all the tonal quality in a black and white photo. Real black and white refers to capturing only the black information and the white information, losing any gradations in between. This is also called "one bit," meaning all the information for a given spot can be represented as either on (black) or off (white). Greyscale uses 8 bits to capture 256 shades of grey. Color can range anywhere from 8 bits to 36 bits.
The Difference Between Laser Printer Output and Imagesetter Output
Laser printers typically output 600 dpi. Imagesetters range from 2400 dpi up. This means that the line screens (halftone screen) on an imagesetter
But that's not all. Imagesetters output to film, not paper, and use light, not toner, to make the image. This means there is no paper stretching or misplaced toner, making the images more uniform and exact. In addition, some laser printers use "resolution enhancement" (RET) to make their halftones more
Options Available in PageMaker
Once the photo is in PageMaker, crop to your heart's content. This will not affect the original in any way, only what is sent to the printer. Note, however, that all the data in a cropped photo will still be sent, making transmission and RIPping slower. It is usually better to place a photo in PageMaker after it has been edited, not before.
If you are sending this to a service bureau or your printer, ASK THEM WHAT TO DO. Some will have strong feelings one way or the other, and some will require RGB, although most will want CYMK. There's no way to know without asking, and as a side benefit, you'll learn something, save money, and get a better looking brochure.
> we have a very striped and ugly greyscale tiff box.
The difference between Pixels, Dots, and Lines Per Inch
Pixels per inch, dots per inch, and lines per inch are confusingly similar sounding. Monitors display dots per inch. Scanners scan in pixels per inch, which is also the unit of Photoshop. Digital cameras simply capture pixels (e.g. 1024x768).
Your display problem is likely the fact that PageMaker is using a low resolution version of your image. In Preferences, change "Graphics Display" to high resolution and see if that helps. But output may still be a problem: see below.
> Geoff Heard mentioned that Photoshop does a lot of dithering and stuff to
Like any continuous tone material (color photos, greyscale photos, gradients, etc.) you want your image to be 1.5x to 2x the number of pixels per inch as your final output will be in lines per inch.
Monochrome images (line drawings, text, etc.) should simply be scanned at the highest possible number of pixels per inch to preserve detail.
> Oh, sorry, We should have explained that it looks even more stripy and
Depending on the settings you have applied, your LaserWriter may be trying to print a higher number of lines per inch and therefore printing fewer greys. This means you have places where there is a large jump in the shade of grey. Instead of a nice transition as you see on the screen in Photoshop, you instead see a jump from, say, 10% to 25%, because there are only so many greys the LaserWriter can produce. This is called "banding," and it gets worse the larger the gradient. Assuming this is the problem, the gradient will look much better when output to an imagesetter, due to its greater output resolution (often 2400 dpi or more).
This is why people add noise to a gradient in Photoshop (this doesn't happen automatically) -- to "blur" those large transitions and reduce banding. This does produce a cleaner gradient at low resolutions, but adds to the file size because it prevents compression.
Not that it is that critical, but I wouldn't call 150 a "very high end" screen. 200 might be a high end screen with 300 being very high end.
Most quick print shops go up to 120. We are a small commercial printer and run at 150 lpi routinely. 85 is a pretty coarse screen. I most papers that I have seen run 85 or so. USA Today, if I'm not mistaken, uses a 100 lpi screen. Just depends on the job specs, but there isn't much commercial use for anything below 85 lpi. Customers demand higher and higher quality, and with a higher lpi, the image looks sharper. Just my two cents, FWIW.
Poster: Jae Lynn <Jaelb@AOL.COM>
> In selecting the scanner, my rather primitive thinking was that since
LPI refers to the halftone screen, while (in popular usage) DPI refers to the resolution of the scan. In general terms, you should overscan a bit, so for a 150 lpi halftone, you would scan at 225-300 dpi (more accurately, PPI or pixels per inch). 150 is a very high end line screen, BTW. Most jobs use no more than 120-133, and many use even less. For instance, quick print shops usually handle no more than 85, and newspapers often use even less.
I've been reading the thread on DPI, LPI, etc., and have to throw in my two cents. For anyone who wants a top-notch explanation of these concepts, the best I've seen appears in David Blatner and Steve Roth's book, "Real World Scanning and Halftones. In this book, they explain the relationship between DPI (output resolution), LPI (screen frequency), and PPI (image resolution), and give clear descriptions on how to get the best output from your scanner and layout program. And, even though it makes reference to older versions of the software programs, (Photoshop/Pagemaker/Quark, etc) the theories and techniques remain current today.
Another good book is How to Make Your Scanner a Great Design Tool. This book xxxxxxxx
If you can find a copy of the Feb. 1993 issue of MacWorld, Steve Roth's article, "Halftones Demystified" sums it up pretty well. Or, if you attended any of the ThunderLizard Productions' Pagemaker conferences (I have the binders from 1994 and 1995) or the Photoshop conferences, they covered the topics there, too.
Other Resources on the Net
Most of the material presented here was taken from the MacWorld article "Halftones Demystified" and the resources listed below:
Scanning FAQ http://www.infomedia.net/scan/
PageMaker FAQ http://www.makingpages.org/pagemaker/pm-faq.html
PAGEMAKR list archives http://www.listserv.iupui.edu/archives/pagemakr.html
Scanning, resolutions, tips, etc. http://www.scantips.com
All rights reserved. Unless otherwise specified, all contents copyright © 1993
Peter C.S. Adams
STEPPS -- Stop Tax Exempt Private Property Sprawl -- Framingham